8 Reasons You Can Blame the Recession on Warden's Law.

 

You probably already know this, but Warden’s Law is a great term that applies to the economy. For example, you could blame it on the recession because you see a lot of people in your neighborhood that are out of work. Or you can blame it on lack of trust in government, which is a huge factor in the current recession. Or you can blame it on you if you are a teacher and you are having a hard time trusting your students.

Wardens Law is a great example of the types of things that people can blame the economy for .

For example, there are over 1.5 billion unemployed people around the world. You can't blame people not having jobs on each other. If you have no job, then that's your fault. Or maybe you have no job but it's going to be okay because your partner can always find a job. That's your fault too. It seems like your partner is probably working his ass off at the same time. Wardens Law is a great example of the types of things that people can blame the recession for. It's a great example because it illustrates how our economy can be blamed for negative events that we are not all responsible for. Basically Warden's Law is the idea that if you have a job then you are responsible for your partner's job. The reason this works is because when a person has a job, it is a given that they will do their partner's job. But a partner has to work for someone and if they don't then they are screwed.

This makes it more likely that people will be able to make good decisions about money and keep their money together .

In the beginning of the recession people were buying houses for less because they were worried about losing their jobs. But now that the economy has recovered, people are more willing to buy a home for the same reason, and therefore the number of first-time home buyers has dropped. It's one more reason why we have a housing crisis. One of the other theories that's gaining a lot of traction is that since home prices have dropped, people are buying more houses on the cheap. This means that people are buying houses they wouldn't have bought anyway. So because people are spending less money, they're also spending less on housing. It's one more reason why we have a housing crisis.

To date, its possible that this argument is over-hyped .

However, there is one other reason that economists are putting forward for the dropping home prices. They are theorizing that people are not just spending less money, they are also buying more houses on the cheap. This theory goes like this. As home prices drop, people are not spending the money on houses they would have spent anyways. They are spending it on houses that they would have bought anyways. The difference between this theory and the other is that the theory, as it stands, assumes that a person's income is the same as it always was. This is a theory that cannot possibly be true. The reason why this theory is so popular, is because it's so easy to disprove. In fact, I've found that the best way to disprove it is to just find yourself a bunch of houses that should have been on your list.