6 Hilarious Tweets About Law of Correspondence

 

law of correspondence

As a lawyer, I get a lot of questions about what I have written here, so I thought I’d offer some of my favorite responses.

1. "I wrote to a lawyer and he said that the law said he would have to follow through on his threats, and it would be best if he had to pay me a visit .


Another lawyer who I am working with has a question that I thought was valid: How can that be with the "law of correspondence" that all lawyers follow? I’ve also had the same question asked by a law professor. She was curious about my answer, so I told her, “There is a law of correspondence among lawyers; if you do something you want done, you have to do it. In any case, the law is pretty clear. If you want to get something done, you have to do it. The law of correspondence doesn't really say anything about what you can and can't do, though. It says what you can and cannot do, but it doesn't say what you should or should not do.


If you want to pay someone off to do something, you have to .


This one is actually pretty funny. In his latest tweet, Law Professor Jeffery Davis basically says that if your client is a criminal lawyer, then you have to defend them if they are the person who is being investigated. For example, if you're the lawyer for someone accused of cheating on their spouse, you have to defend them if they are the person accused. But if you're a lawyer for someone accused of cheating on their spouse, you have to defend them if they are the cheater. The idea behind this is that most people who think they are lawyers are actually just trying to save their own asses. In reality, a lawyer is a lawyer is a lawyer and a lawyer is a lawyer. And in the real world you get to argue your case, and it's not always going to be about saving your own ass. So if youre a lawyer for a cheater, you have to defend them in court if they are the cheater. In fact, you have to defend them if they are the cheater, because a lawyer is not a lawyer so you must defend them if they are the cheater.


law of correspondence


And guess what ?


You can't really defend a cheater, because if you are the cheater, you are the cheater. The law of correspondence is the law that says if you are on your way to the court for the defense of a person who has been accused of cheating, then if you are the cheater, you will not be on your way to the court. The law of correspondence is just a funny thing, but the most hilarious part of the law is that it requires you to defend a person accused of cheating if you are the cheater. It's like a law professor saying, "Hey, I could care less about students' feelings, but my job is to write this law and I'm going to have to defend people for cheating if they are the cheaters.


That's the law of correspondence, but it's not exactly like a law professor .


At least not in the legal sense. Rather, the law of correspondence requires that you defend a person accused of cheating if you are the cheater. So if you are in a situation where you are accused of cheating, you are going to have to defend against that charge. In that sense, it's actually a pretty interesting law. It's kind of like a game of cat and mouse where the law wants you to have to defend against the charge of cheating so they can go home at night. You end up defending yourself so you can go home, and then they go home. It kinda goes to trial and conviction, but the law gets to win. It really, really does, so it's pretty fun.

No comments